• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • Disclaimer

The Effectiveness Exchange

It is much better to do the right thing wronger than the wrong thing right

  • Home
  • Articles
  • In the news
  • Book reviews
  • Evidence
    • Case studies
    • Other
  • Media
    • Videos
    • Podcasts/audio
  • Theories and methods
    • Systems thinking
    • The Vanguard Method
    • Viable Systems Model (VSM)
    • Soft Systems Methodology (SSM)
    • Systems dynamics
    • Complexity
    • Lean for services
    • Agile
    • Design thinking
You are here: Home / Articles / Using Purpose to Design and manage for effectiveness, learning and autonomy

Using Purpose to Design and manage for effectiveness, learning and autonomy

24/09/2023 By Howard Clark 1 Comment

If you were to ask most managers if they trust their teams, they would probably look at you a little shocked and say ‘of course!’ And yet many aspects of our organisations have not been designed for trust. And because we live inside the organisations we are often blind to how a lack of trust has been designed into, well everything (including technology). Let me give you an example.

Managing a team of managers

At one point in my career I was managing a team of international project managers. All of these managers were at different stages of their careers, working in multiple hybrid locations and all bright and dedicated people. I had no desire, interest, inclination or time to sit on their shoulders and second-guess them. Nor did I want them constantly looking to the hierarchy or looking over their shoulders. I am not a controlling person because all you get is compliance (not learning) and often terrible services. And I certainly understood that the three pages of job description were not a useful or viable method.* Instead I wanted them to decide and do what was best for customers and the business in a simple and effective way. After a brief discussion with my very supportive leader (he was brilliant like that), I had the green light to move forward.  

*If you want to test that, ask people to tell you what is in their job description and you’ll soon understand how it is not a useful method for guiding activity.

Using Purpose in practice

Gathering the team together, over a few weeks we worked up a core purpose and some simple objectives that worked dynamically together. The aim being that the managers then began to put these to use in their projects to guide them, and at the same time give them discretion, choice and control. And we tried every week to share learning, talk about issues and develop as a group.  

The Project Management Purpose and three simple objectives

As a group we decided that the purpose of Project Management was

‘To create the Right Change, Right First Time’

And to do this:

1. Add value by delivering projects and improving situations that achieve a positive outcome for customers and the business 

2. Keep studying and learning about better ways of achieving purpose and objective 1

3. Apply that learning in practice and evaluate the outcomes and improve as necessary

Together these summed-up the general aims of the job description in a more useful way.

Acknowledgement – On the use of Purpose for direction

Nothing emerges in a vacuum and I always believe in acknowledging origins. I was lucky enough to have learned and worked with the inspirational occupational psychologist, public speaker and management thinker John Seddon. He taught consultants working for his company (Vanguard Consulting) to follow purpose and principles. In this way consultants are able to exercise both discretion and judgment in how the purpose is delivered. If a consultant wished to reflect upon an issue, John and the network of fellow senior consultants were always available. He always provided consultants lots of opportunities to share learning (and mistakes) through regular learning sessions. The result is a mature autonomy and not a top-down ‘I say, you do’ approach as found in Theory X.
———————

Commercially sensitive

I have a duty of care to organisations that I work with. Information related to the organisation is commercially sensitive and never discussed. I always anonymise the article and wherever possible obscure which organisation this might be. Although I feel it is fair to write about what I have done and General concepts. And I have worked in well over 20 organisations and on 30 plus projects.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Autonomy, Change, Discretion, Effectiveness, John Seddon, leadership, management, Purpose, systems thinking, the Vanguard Method, transformation

About Howard Clark

Howard Clark has 20 years experience of services effectiveness, operations management and consulting in the public, private and HEI sectors. He has spent 12 years consulting as an external and internal consultant including 5 years with Vanguard Consulting.

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Enhancing Organizational Effictiveness: The Impact of Applying McGregor's Theory Y - The Effectiveness Exchange says:
    20/01/2024 at 06:28

    […] weaving McGregor’s Theory Y snippet, explaining the issue, and painting the benefits: treating staff like grown-ups, saving time, and redirecting […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Connect

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Studying reveals the impact of incentives

20/03/2019

Systems thinking in Lloyds bank

13/03/2019

Systems Thinking in Advice UK

13/03/2019

Systems Thinking in Aviva

13/03/2019

Archives

  • November 2024
  • June 2024
  • February 2024
  • September 2023
  • June 2021
  • January 2020
  • October 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019

Book reviews

08/06/2021

Personas have become … [Read More...] about Reflecting upon Personas

29/10/2019

If you are … [Read More...] about Beyond Command and Control by John Seddon

22/02/2019

If you are … [Read More...] about Freedom from Command & Control

Footer

Recent Key Words

Agile appraisals Banking Better regulation call centre Change Conservative party Digital Digital by Design Effectiveness effectiveness exchange efficiency efficiency exchange fail fast Government higher education Human motivation Human Resources Insurance John Seddon kanban Labour Party Lean Lean six sigma learning Local Government management McGregor motivation project management Public Sector Purpose ray ison Regulation regulatory retrospectives scrum Services improvement strategy systems thinking targets the effectiveness exchange the Vanguard Method transformation University

Recent Posts

  • John Seddon episode on The Aural Apothecary podcast 17/11/2024
  • Rethinking Regulation: A Manifesto 02/11/2024
  • An antidote to Whack a mole projects 11/06/2024
  • Enhancing Organisational Effectiveness: The Impact of Applying McGregor’s Theory Y 20/02/2024
  • Using Purpose to Design and manage for effectiveness, learning and autonomy 24/09/2023

© Copyright 2019 DW World Ltd · All Rights Reserved ·